top of page

Why the Hormuz Crisis Isn’t Crushing S&P 500 Earnings

  • JASON TEH, Chief Investment Officer
  • May 15
  • 4 min read

In Do Geopolitical Oil Shocks Cause Equity Bear Markets? we argued that oil shocks alone do not cause bear markets — the outcome depends on the macro backdrop when the shock arrives. The question that naturally follows: now that US earnings season is largely complete, has the Hormuz crisis left any mark on corporate earnings? The short answer, noted in US Corporate Earnings Surge Drives Markets, is that US earnings are surging despite the crisis. But to understand why the oil shock has failed to derail corporate profits, the 2022 episode is the critical reference point.


In 2022, the Ukraine invasion led to the oil price spiking to US$120/bbl. It occurred at a time when S&P 500 earnings growth was decelerating. The post-COVID surge was losing steam and the economy was entering a quiet manufacturing recession that would last nearly three years. Technology stocks were simultaneously hit by stock-specific earnings downgrades that compounded the market’s pain. The S&P 500 recorded its worst annual return since the 2009 Global Financial Crisis.


Source: FactSet


The 2026 Hormuz crisis also led to an oil spike, but arrived into a very different earnings environment. Coming out of 2025, S&P 500 earnings growth was accelerating. With 89% of the index having reported Q1 2026 results, forward earnings estimates have been revised upward throughout the reporting season. The current S&P 500 next twelve months earnings per share (EPS) growth of 25% is one of the highest on record, trailing only the historic rebounds following the 2009 Global Financial Crisis and the 2020 COVID pandemic.


Technology Leads

The surge in S&P 500 earnings growth has been led by technology stocks, which comprise about 40% of the index. The Nasdaq EPS is running at 38% annual growth. Within the sector, the standout is semiconductors, with EPS surging 132% on the back of hyperscaler capex commitments. Semiconductors alone now account for about 15% of the S&P 500 — more than the Energy, Materials, and Utilities sectors combined — which means the earnings acceleration in chips flows directly through to the aggregate index.


Source: FactSet


Manufacturing recovery

The S&P 500 earnings surge is broader than the technology sector alone. The Russell 2000 small-cap index is also posting improving earnings growth. The reason for this is not hard to find. Small caps have a far greater exposure to the domestic manufacturing and industrial cycle than the large-cap, tech-heavy index, which means their earnings are a direct read on the health of the US goods economy.


From November 2022 through December 2024, the ISM Manufacturing Index was below 50 for 26 consecutive months, the longest contraction on record. This was the post-COVID industrial hangover. Manufacturers overproduced, inventories bloated, and the cycle corrected quietly while the headline economy held up through services and labour markets.

The cycle has now turned. The ISM Manufacturing PMI moved above 50 in January 2026 for the first time in over two years, and has remained in expansion territory since. New orders have expanded for three consecutive months, confirming the recovery has momentum.


Source: FactSet

 

In early-cycle recoveries, volumes rise against a largely fixed cost base, producing sharp earnings acceleration for companies linked to the manufacturing cycle. Pent-up operating leverage is now unwinding, and the Russell 2000 is posting annual earnings growth of just under 30% after two years of moribund growth. The earnings of J.B. Hunt Transport Services (JBHT) illustrate this dynamic most vividly.


Source: FactSet


The largest US intermodal and truckload operator, JBHT is one of the most inextricably tied companies to the manufacturing cycle. Trucking companies are the lifeblood of the manufacturing economy, moving raw materials in and finished goods out, which makes their earnings one of the most reliable proxies for the health of the broader economy beyond large-cap technology. The Q1 2026 results bear this out. JBHT posted diluted EPS of $1.49, up 27% from $1.17 a year ago. Intermodal loads hit a first-quarter record, with management characterising demand strength as broad-based. These are not the numbers of an economy being derailed by an oil shock.


Conclusion

In late 1973, the oil shock delivered a killing blow to an economy already contracting and an index dominated by energy-intensive industrials. In early 2022, it arrived as the manufacturing cycle and technology earnings were rolling over. In both cases, the macro was already deteriorating when crude spiked.


In 2026, the oil shock arrived in the middle of a hyperscaler capex boom and a manufacturing sector in its early months of expansion. Earnings growth is accelerating, breadth is widening, and the reporting season has so far absorbed the crisis without visible damage.


The Hormuz risk has not disappeared. A prolonged closure that embeds inflation and forces central banks higher could still slow the economy. But the earnings starting point is fundamentally different from either precedent. With the two pillars of the earnings recovery — semiconductor demand and the manufacturing cycle — still intact, we could be in the early innings of an S&P 500 earnings expansion that the oil spike has so far failed to interrupt.

 
 
 

Comments


DISCLAIMER 

This website and its contents are general in nature and do not constitute or convey personal financial advice. It has been prepared without consideration of anyone’s financial situation, needs, or financial objectives. Before acting on the areas discussed and contained herein, you should consider whether it is appropriate for you and whether you need to seek professional advice. Investment in securities and other financial products involves risk. An investment in a financial product may have the potential for capital growth and income but may also carry the risk that the total return on the investment may be less than the amount contributed directly by the investor. Investors risk losing some or all of their capital invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The material contained in this website is for information purposes only and is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to the subscription for, purchase or sale of securities or financial products and neither or anything in it shall form the basis of any contract or commitment. The Company, its related parties and its respective officers may have an interest in the securities or derivatives of any entities referred to in this website. The analyst(s) hereby certify that all the views expressed in this report accurately reflect their personal views about the subject investment theme and/or company securities. Except for any liability which cannot be excluded, the authors of this website accept no liability for any loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of that person, or any other person, placing any reliance on the contents of this website.

Vertium Asset Management Pty Ltd (ABN 25 615 639 659), is a Corporate Authorised Representative (Corporate Authorised Representative Number 001258758) of Clime Asset Management Pty Ltd (ABN 72 098 420 770), AFSL 221146.

The rating issued October 2021 APIR OPS1827AU is published by Lonsec Research Pty Ltd ABN 11 151 658 561 AFSL 421 445 (Lonsec). Ratings are general advice only, and have been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider your personal circumstances, read the product disclosure statement and seek independent financial advice before investing. The rating is not a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold any product. Past performance information is not indicative of future performance. Ratings are subject to change without notice and Lonsec assumes no obligation to update. Lonsec uses objective criteria and receives a fee from the Fund Manager. Visit lonsec.com.au for ratings information and to access the full report. © 2022 Lonsec. All rights reserved.

The Zenith Investment Partners (ABN 27 103 132 672, AFS Licence 226872) (“Zenith”) rating (assigned APIR OPS1827AU May 2024) referred to in this piece is limited to “General Advice” (s766B Corporations Act 2001) for Wholesale clients only. This advice has been prepared without taking into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of any individual, including target markets of financial products, where applicable, and is subject to change at any time without prior notice. It is not a specific recommendation to purchase, sell or hold the relevant product(s). Investors should seek independent financial advice before making an investment decision and should consider the appropriateness of this advice in light of their own objectives, financial situation and needs. Investors should obtain a copy of, and consider the PDS or offer document before making any decision and refer to the full Zenith Product Assessment available on the Zenith website. Past performance is not an indication of future performance. Zenith usually charges the product issuer, fund manager or related party to conduct Product Assessments. Full details regarding Zenith’s methodology, ratings definitions and regulatory compliance are available on our Product Assessments and at http://www.zenithpartners.com.au/RegulatoryGuidelines

bottom of page